EEND 679 module 3 disc
EEND 679
Module 3
Jim Nielsen
This week we are focusing on assessment strategies and the
use of technology to deliver assessments.
For the discussion, we were able to watch a number of videos discussing
the validity of assessments and how to make sure you are really assessing what
you want from the students.
The first video by Rick Wormeli was one that I have seen
before. In fact, I have seen a couple of
videos from him at different faculty meetings.
This is mainly because our school has adopted Mastery Learning as the main
driving force of our curriculum. So much
so, that all classes are required to have a retake policy on assessments. At first, I feel like the staff in general
did not like the idea of retakes for mastery.
This could be for many reasons including the fact that we don’t get
do-overs in life, why should students in school. Also it is a lot of work to prepare for
retakes and making a second assessment that assesses the same material.
For me, I bought into Wormeli’s ideas and our school goals
right of the bat! I have never been a
fan of points or tests determining your grade.
As a science teacher I have always valued the experiences over the
points. That is why my favorite point
that Wormeli makes is that grades are like an economic bartering system. Grades shouldn’t be a bartering tool or a
payment for a task. I find it hard for
students to wrap their head around this because they have been in that system
for their entire life.
I believe in Wormeli’s
teaching for Mastery because I think it works. If my job is to help students understand the
function of the circulatory system in their body, do I really care how, and
when that student masters the material.
For me, the answer has become that I don’t care how the knowledge gets
in their head, just that we get it there!
Of course, deadlines are important and teaching responsibility and
organization skills are just as important lessons for high schoolers to get in
their 4 years before college. Along with
Wormeli, I really view my curriculum as a means of delivering skill sets that
will make them more productive members of society, and less trivia facts that
they may never use again in life. I have
also moved to put authenticity of the material above all other criteria when
designing a lesson.
The ”Food for Thought” video was a good watch as well. I agree with her telescope metaphor. Tests are like a telescope that shines on
just a few stars… in a universe of wonder.
I completely agree with her on that quote. It’s actually why I despise standardized
tests, and even multiple choice tests in my class. I often refer to them as necessary evil. If I could have a class, and was supported in
doing so, I would probably do away with typical tests. They often test trivia knowledge, and again
test the skill can the student determine which answer is not correct. Real learning for me comes from experiences. Especially in science.
These videos I watched today really made me feel good about
the direction I am taking my instruction.
I really have begun to throw away schedules, try not to be constricted
by curriculum or tests, and focus on authentic science happening in my student’s
reality. My main job has become to
produce productive, scientifically literate students. These students will go on to be able to make
important decisions like whether to vaccinate their children, and will be able
to vote in leaders that not only support science, but use it to make important
policies.
P.S. I love how the
video touched on how important it is to teach environmental education!!
Thank you,
Jim Nielsen
Comments
Post a Comment