EEND 679 Module 7 discussion:


Hello class,

For this discussion we are supposed to comment on how we utilize data to improve our instruction.  Specifically, how can we use the data to personalize instruction.  Luckily, this has actually been the goal of our PLC (professional learning community) for Biology over the past 2 years.  We make common questions for our assessments, analyze data, and discuss what improvements need to be made as far as instruction is concerned.
 
Our PLC uses a program called Mastery Manager to collect our data.  This program has been really helpful in allowing us to set what questions we want to collect data and has made it easy to compare among classrooms.  You can easily separate out specific questions, align questions to standards, run data analysis for sub groups, or really any other data piece I can think of….

Specifically, we analyze 10 common questions that we all put on our summative assessments for each unit.  We then discuss what went well, what needs improvement, and what questions need to be rewritten.  But, the most powerful aspect of analyzing this data is we can personalize instruction more for our students.  If one teacher uses a strategy that he/she feels works well for a specific topic, and then it shows in their student’s test scores, the other teachers can use this data to enhance their classroom or personalize the instruction for their students based on data.  This has been very advantageous for me, and I have included many lessons over the past 2 years because of this collaboration.  Every teacher has strengths, and using data to highlight these strong lessons improves the instruction of every teacher in the PLC. 

This also leads to mastery learning in the classroom as well.  I have adopted a Mastery Learning approach with all of my assessments this year.  Students can “retake” any test or quiz that they did not Master the first time.  All they have to do is come to 2 review sessions, offered everyday before and after school, to get a ticket to the retake.  Then, they take the same assessment scrambled.  The student gets the better of the two grades, which is almost always the second test.  I use these individual review sessions to individualize instruction, use the data we got from the first test including student misconceptions, utilize my co-workers collaborative ideas, and personalize the instruction to help the student achieve mastery with the content.  I tell my students that it isn’t about “re-doing” the test… If my goal is to get the info in their noggin, then does it really matter if it takes a little extra time working with the material and reassessing them afterwards.

One area of assessing that I need a little work on is rubrics.  Especially for projects and activities.  My rubrics are pretty basic, and are also I’ll admit extremely subjective.  After viewing our resources for the week, I realize I need a lot of work in this area.  Definitely somewhere I could grow with the help of technology and my coursework at SFU.

Thank you,
Jim Nielsen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EEND 675 Artifact #2: Palm Oil and Deforestation-blend space

EEND 679 Module 4 Discussion

678 Module 8 Discussion