EEND 679 Module 7 discussion:
Hello class,
For this discussion we are supposed to comment on how we
utilize data to improve our instruction.
Specifically, how can we use the data to personalize instruction. Luckily, this has actually been the goal of
our PLC (professional learning community) for Biology over the past 2
years. We make common questions for our
assessments, analyze data, and discuss what improvements need to be made as far
as instruction is concerned.
Our PLC uses a program called Mastery Manager to collect our
data. This program has been really
helpful in allowing us to set what questions we want to collect data and has
made it easy to compare among classrooms.
You can easily separate out specific questions, align questions to
standards, run data analysis for sub groups, or really any other data piece I
can think of….
Specifically, we analyze 10 common questions that we all put
on our summative assessments for each unit.
We then discuss what went well, what needs improvement, and what
questions need to be rewritten. But, the
most powerful aspect of analyzing this data is we can personalize instruction
more for our students. If one teacher
uses a strategy that he/she feels works well for a specific topic, and then it
shows in their student’s test scores, the other teachers can use this data to
enhance their classroom or personalize the instruction for their students based
on data. This has been very advantageous
for me, and I have included many lessons over the past 2 years because of this
collaboration. Every teacher has
strengths, and using data to highlight these strong lessons improves the
instruction of every teacher in the PLC.
This also leads to mastery learning in the classroom as
well. I have adopted a Mastery Learning
approach with all of my assessments this year.
Students can “retake” any test or quiz that they did not Master the
first time. All they have to do is come
to 2 review sessions, offered everyday before and after school, to get a ticket
to the retake. Then, they take the same
assessment scrambled. The student gets
the better of the two grades, which is almost always the second test. I use these individual review sessions to
individualize instruction, use the data we got from the first test including
student misconceptions, utilize my co-workers collaborative ideas, and
personalize the instruction to help the student achieve mastery with the
content. I tell my students that it isn’t
about “re-doing” the test… If my goal is to get the info in their noggin, then
does it really matter if it takes a little extra time working with the material
and reassessing them afterwards.
One area of assessing that I need a little work on is
rubrics. Especially for projects and
activities. My rubrics are pretty basic,
and are also I’ll admit extremely subjective.
After viewing our resources for the week, I realize I need a lot of work
in this area. Definitely somewhere I
could grow with the help of technology and my coursework at SFU.
Thank you,
Jim Nielsen
Comments
Post a Comment